Statistical tricks from NZ Ministry of Health & its continued false claims of 'safe and effective'
When deaths of the 'vaccinated' are counted deaths of the 'unvaccinated' and death itself doesn't get defined as as 'unsafe'.
One year after the NZ Ministry of Health knew about the high risks (especially to the young) of serious adverse events from the experimental injections, they repeatedly published claims of the ‘safe and effective’ without supplying any evidence.
Subsequently, eighteen months later, they continue to dodge the absence of this evidence when we know they had evidence that paradoxically (and tragically) confirmed the opposite.
This is emotionally draining research, but we must continue to shine unrelenting sunlight on these lies and obfuscations, to disinfect the evil darkness. To begin afresh with ethical solutions.
On the 9th Oct 2022, I sent an Official Information Act (OIA) request (Ref H2022014265) about this Media Release from the NZ Ministry of Health - which was promoting the Pfizer experimental injections. In it, these [propaganda] phrases appeared:
On the 20th Oct 2022, I received this (grammatically clumsy and) unsatisfactory response:
“The underlying data that supports this statement {screenshot above} is based off (sic) analyses from Aotearoa's [sic] experience of the COVID pandemic, recently published by the Ministry of Health in the mortality report for COVID-19, COVID-19 Mortality in Aotearoa New Zealand: Inequities in Risk”.
Having already read this cited report carefully, I highlighted that (as you can see if you click on it) that there were no documents, cited research or relevant data attached to it, that supported the claims made. So I followed-up my request to the MoH, as per my original OIA inquiry, to ask for the evidence of the claims made within the published documents for the “safe and effective”. I sent a continuation of my OIA request, worded thus:
I’m confused by this response. There is no reference in the source document you supplied to the individuals with NO injection. Only to “Less than 2 doses” hence the claim and the associated data is flawed. Please supply the evidence as requested in my OIA.
On the 7th Nov 2022, I received this in the OIA response:
The statement quoted in your original request compared individuals who had received two or more doses, with individuals who had received one or no doses. For the purpose of the mortality report, Manatū Hauora (the Ministry of Health) did not engage in an analysis of two or more doses compared to one dose specifically. Similarly, we did not engage in an analysis of two or more doses compared to no doses specifically. Individuals with one dose and no doses were grouped together. The primary aim of the mortality analysis was not to calculate vaccine effectiveness. (my emphasis)
The irony in that final sentence (above), shows how these captured agencies claims related to the ‘safe and effective’ could be totally disconnected from mortality data, whilst simultaneously claiming it protected individuals from death!
Orwellian indeed.
I know many readers will already know that globally, and in complete lockstep, those who complied with the coercion and received one injection, were not ‘counted’ in their country’s stats as ‘fully vaccinated’ - neither were the individuals who had taken two (or more) doses, but were still within the specified time period (2 weeks) after their dose. But many more are awakening and only just beginning to see these facts for the first time.
I wanted to revisit these facts, for three reasons:
The (fake) reports in question still appear on the NZ Ministry of Health’s Website and the NZ Gov is still actively promoting the injections, via MSM advertising and posters. And illogical ‘vaccine’ mandates continue in numerous workplaces, including understaffed healthcare sectors (see my previous posts about this, which incidentally is the subject of another outstanding complaint to the Ombudsman).
Despite lodging a(nother) complaint with the NZ Ombudsman, about this (Case No. 004162), i ask is the Ombudsman fit for purpose, as they have today emailed me to say… well, nothing actually:
And finally,
Many of us who had read the Pfizer clinical trial documents, knew at the time, but now we have ample evidence, that the Ministry of Health knew about the heightened risks of serious adverse events such as myocarditis. Yet they ignored those strong warnings from the Chief Science Advisor and many, many others, and kept promoting the toxic experimental injections anyway. The worldwide Censorship-Industrial-Complex kept growing during this time, too.
With credit to
for Tweeting the above.
And The Health Forum NZ for sharing the information.
We await the slow turning of the legal cogs worldwide: there is some progress. But meanwhile innocent people all around us, continue to suffer ill-health and die unexpectedly.
NB This research takes lots of time and lots of patience (I’m not good with patience). Please help raise awareness by sharing this post.
Once again Ursula ... you post critically important information ... and your work exposing the horrific crimes of our Govt ... and they are horrific crimes ... is exemplary ... thank you ....
https://windowsontheworld.substack.com/p/one-flew-over-the-cuckoos-nest
pb
Yes. My uncle died 48 hours after his first jab. He will be classed as an unvaccinated death. The corruption in the health system is not new. I first became aware of it 20 years ago. They’ve been covering up adverse events and harming and killing us with blatantly wrong advice for decades.