It's a bit like giving the game plan to the opposition coach, imo. They'll give it their "best shot" then come back to the client with a lousy take or leave it proposal. I might be wrong, doubt it.
lawyers pride themselves on being able to see both side - argue for one or the other - as both need 'representing'. although I thought NZDSOS lawyers were hugely conflicted but happy to rake in as much as they possibly could, in the 100's of thousands of dollars, not sure how they justify their hundreds of dollars/hour fees. And yes just giving your deepest secrets to a 'neutral' party ...yeah nah
It's a bit like giving the game plan to the opposition coach, imo. They'll give it their "best shot" then come back to the client with a lousy take or leave it proposal. I might be wrong, doubt it.
lawyers pride themselves on being able to see both side - argue for one or the other - as both need 'representing'. although I thought NZDSOS lawyers were hugely conflicted but happy to rake in as much as they possibly could, in the 100's of thousands of dollars, not sure how they justify their hundreds of dollars/hour fees. And yes just giving your deepest secrets to a 'neutral' party ...yeah nah
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/545842/terrible-surprise-33-air-new-zealand-employees-fighting-company-s-covid-policy a short legacy media piece about it this morning !
Word on the street is that NZ suffers from having "activist" judges.
thanks, Ursula.
I learned the hard way not to expect too much from lawyers and judges
Just like politicians pretending they have power, judges and lawyers pretend to have tools and insights enabling them to speak for us.
Mostly, those tools are used to slow things down, enabling more wealth transfer