Evil intent IMO. Everywhere one looks now there is poisoning going on. Glyphosate, 1080, big Pharma's cocktails. One can cite all the studies galore and the 'authorities' aren't interested. Or they pretend for a while to be interested then roll out their (already made) decision to push on with the poisoning. Those who dissent or object are simply butting their heads on brick walls. To put it bluntly, the clear intent, as has been expressed by many for a very long time, is to reduce our numbers. Fluoride's just one of the many tools in their toolbox.
Clearly the Men Who Run the World are aware that diets high in sugar and carbohydrates destroy the human body. They know that statins are no solution to the diseases caused by these diets. They know seed oils should not be consumed by humans. They definitely understand that their food pyramid is a colossal lie.
And they know that vaccines are also dramatically reducing life spans.
Many will argue that the food and pharma industries are benefitting from these outcomes. They make billions of dollars off of addicting humans to these health-destroying inputs and even more from treating the inevitable diseases that result from bad diets.
I disagree that this was inevitable and I would argue that this is all part of a plan, a necessary plan.
The Men Who Run the World and their minions have the ability to stop this. All they would have to do is employ some of the same strategies that were used to convince 6 billion to inject a deadly vaccine. They could easily crush demand for sugary drinks and processed foods by pounding them with high taxes.
We have seen how governments are capable of ending the addiction to tobacco. Why not do the same for sugary foods. I would argue that they decided to come down hard on smoking because it was killing people too quickly and damaging productivity on their farm. They did not make tobacco the enemy because they love ya’ll.
Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?
Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.
Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.
All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.
Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?
You are Expendable
At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.
They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.
Without these wise decisions by the Men Who Run the World to deploy strategies to cull the herd, the global economy would have collapsed years ago under the dead weight of too many geriatrics.
And keep in mind the real rate limiting step for population- the availability of economically achievable energy. I admired the windmills in Australia when I toured in 2004. Now, not so much.
I look at the 5 x 10^8 goal as optimal (for them)- enough to stock Epstein's Fantasy Island and provide for Margaret Atwood's Handmaids.
When are we all going to wake up to the clear evil intent, coming from so many angles/vectors?
Evil intent IMO. Everywhere one looks now there is poisoning going on. Glyphosate, 1080, big Pharma's cocktails. One can cite all the studies galore and the 'authorities' aren't interested. Or they pretend for a while to be interested then roll out their (already made) decision to push on with the poisoning. Those who dissent or object are simply butting their heads on brick walls. To put it bluntly, the clear intent, as has been expressed by many for a very long time, is to reduce our numbers. Fluoride's just one of the many tools in their toolbox.
It is not evil - it is NECESSARY https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
Hi Ursula, Hi Pammy!
Norman Kirk, our last people's prime minister, was also the last to take aim at monopolies.
When the corporations become bigger than the governments, can we blame incoming pollies for being powerless?
We have to hold commercial entities to a manageable size.
Basically, the corporations have become SO big, they ARE the Government!
I am currently reading about aluminum toxicity (Alzheimer's, SIDS, etc.)
AlF3 is a step in the process, with known release.
I know an expert in aluminum neurotoxicity, I am planning to review the combined toxicity at our next encounter.
Why are they Poisoning the Herd?
Clearly the Men Who Run the World are aware that diets high in sugar and carbohydrates destroy the human body. They know that statins are no solution to the diseases caused by these diets. They know seed oils should not be consumed by humans. They definitely understand that their food pyramid is a colossal lie.
And they know that vaccines are also dramatically reducing life spans.
Many will argue that the food and pharma industries are benefitting from these outcomes. They make billions of dollars off of addicting humans to these health-destroying inputs and even more from treating the inevitable diseases that result from bad diets.
I disagree that this was inevitable and I would argue that this is all part of a plan, a necessary plan.
The Men Who Run the World and their minions have the ability to stop this. All they would have to do is employ some of the same strategies that were used to convince 6 billion to inject a deadly vaccine. They could easily crush demand for sugary drinks and processed foods by pounding them with high taxes.
We have seen how governments are capable of ending the addiction to tobacco. Why not do the same for sugary foods. I would argue that they decided to come down hard on smoking because it was killing people too quickly and damaging productivity on their farm. They did not make tobacco the enemy because they love ya’ll.
Why Don’t They Discourage Bad Dietary Choices and Stop Vaccinating?
Consider the impacts on the economy of not reducing the life spans of humans.
Let’s say 30% of the population of a country lived beyond 90 years. Pension plans would implode as there would not be enough money to cover redemptions. For those on public pensions, we could raise taxes to ensure pensioners get paid, but that would mean less money for schools, roads and other infrastructure. Government services would need to be dramatically scaled back resulting in huge job losses.
All of these elderly people would essentially be ‘useless eaters’ sapping the economic strength of the country to provide them with medical care and free bus passes, while they produce and contribute nothing.
Why did they ramp up the vaccine schedule in the 80’s? I would suggest that they did this because population (which grows exponentially) was about to get out of control so they needed to take action. What would our overall population be if not for the vaccine push and the dramatic increase in the availability of processed foods in recent decades?
You are Expendable
At the end of the day all they care about is having enough circus and barnyard animals to operate the farm. They could care less about you or your health - you are EXPENDABLE.
They most certainly do not want one third of the population living to 90+ Japan and China are prime examples of what happens when a country is top heavy on elderly citizens. Too few young people to support the elderly.
Without these wise decisions by the Men Who Run the World to deploy strategies to cull the herd, the global economy would have collapsed years ago under the dead weight of too many geriatrics.
The Solution: https://fasteddynz.substack.com/p/vaccines-are-population-control
And keep in mind the real rate limiting step for population- the availability of economically achievable energy. I admired the windmills in Australia when I toured in 2004. Now, not so much.
I look at the 5 x 10^8 goal as optimal (for them)- enough to stock Epstein's Fantasy Island and provide for Margaret Atwood's Handmaids.