The Covid-19 injections should never have been foisted upon the population.
Countless people who were never at serious risk of disease, including children and young people…most people actually…were coerced, intimidated, and many were even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions.
In Australia, the entire population has been deliberately terrorised about Covid-19, with widespread mandates imposed, trashing voluntary informed consent.
What has happened in Australia is beyond belief – coerced medical interventions in a supposed ‘free’ country.
This is a scandal of ginormous proportions, still hidden from public view, as the rotten conflicted mainstream media here has failed to inform the public.
What must be investigated now are the actions of the National Cabinet, led by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison, along with former premiers Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others, and the Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC. This is where the vaccine mandates were initiated, with the floodgates eventually opening for mandates around the country.
For more background, see for example my substack articles:
I am very proud to have been involved in the Kids’ case to try and halt the rollout to children in NZ, though I’m so sad that we failed. There are a handful of dead children who should be alive today. Bloomfield et al knew this would happen.
What do you call it when a government knows that an intervention will kill some children, but ploughs ahead with it anyway?
If only those clowns in the video had some understanding of the devastation they helped to cause.
I have so much gratitude and respect for all of you who pushed back against this madness.
Re Covid-19 vaccination of children...who were at little or no risk of disease...
I challenged Nigel Crawford, the Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) about this in my email to him dated 22 April 2022, see text below...I didn't receive a response...
Nigel Crawford, why does ATAGI recommend the use of the paediatric Pfizer COVID-19 injection in all children aged 5 to 11 years in Australia?[1]
ATAGI advice notes "Most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness. Those who are symptomatic typically have a short illness with a median duration of 5 days..." ATAGI also notes that "...children aged 5-11 years...were the least likely of all age groups to require hospitalisation or ICU admission for COVID-19..." ATAGI also notes: "Deaths in children due to COVID-19 are rare. Data from the United Kingdom suggest that 2 per every 1 million children infected with the virus died of COVID-19."
ATAGI advice indicates most children have an effective natural immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and are at low risk of disease, i.e. COVID-19.
Q.1. What is the independent and objective scientific evidence underpinning ATAGI's recommendation that children aged 5 to 11 years have two injections of the TGA provisionally approved Pfizer COVID-19 COMIRNATY mRNA pharmaceutical product?[2]
Q.2. Does the paediatric Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injection for children aged 5 to 11 years prevent infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2?
Q.3. What are the long term risks of initiating COVID-19 novel mRNA injections in children, such as the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injection?
Q.4 What impact will this medical intervention have on children's natural immune response to SARS-CoV-2 going forward?
Q.5 Is it planned to give children regular COVID-19 injections in future, as appears to be being set up across the broader population, with the securing of 280 million doses of COVID-19 injections to support the COVID-19 injection roll-out[3] for Australia's population of 26 million, i.e. more than 10 doses for everyone in Australia?
Q.6 What is the scientific rationale for giving COVID-19 mRNA injections to individuals at low risk from COVID-19?
Q.7 Where is the independent and objective scientific evidence demonstrating the safety of novel mRNA injections for children?
Health care practitioners are administering the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injections to children:
Q.8. Have any health care practitioners questioned why ATAGI recommends these COVID-19 mRNA injections for children given children's low risk of COVID-19?
Young children are relying on their parents/carers to provide 'valid voluntary consent' to the COVID-19 mRNA injections on their behalf. Parents must be properly informed of the risks of 'the virus'/disease relevant to age and health status:
Q.9. Are health care practitioners being reminded of their ethical responsibility to obtain 'valid voluntary consent' before administration of the COVID-19 mRNA injections, as stipulated in the section on 'Valid consent' in The Australian Immunisation Handbook?[4] For example, valid consent "must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation" and "It can only be given after the potential risks of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person".
Nigel Crawford, I request your early response to my questions.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
I forwarded my email to ATAGI Chair Nigel Crawford, above, to Karen Price, then President of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) on 9 May 2022, see text below. No response from Karen Price either...these people treat the concerns of the public with contempt...
Karen Price, please see below my email to Nigel Crawford, Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), questioning ATAGI's recommendation for COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years.
As children are at low risk of COVID-19, why are parents/carers being pressed to have children injected with these novel mRNA pharmaceutical products?
Has the RACGP questioned ATAGI why children are being injected with these novel mRNA pharmaceutical products?
Is 'valid voluntary consent' being properly obtained before the administration of these medical interventions to children? What information is being provided to parents/carers to enable them to make an informed decision on this medical intervention?
Karen Price, I've previously asked you to clarify how general practitioners are obtaining valid voluntary consent from people before administration of the Covid-19 jabs, see my email: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding 'valid voluntary consent', 28 February 2022. More than two months later you have still not responded - I question whether this is gross negligence, your refusal to engage on this most important matter.
The RACGP says: "Patient-centred care is at the heart of every Australian general practice, and at the heart of everything we do".
Karen Price, general practitioners have an ethical responsibility to care for their patients, including obtaining 'valid voluntary consent' before any medical intervention, including vaccination, as stipulated in The Australian Immunisation Handbook. You are president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, please respond to my emails regarding 'valid voluntary consent'.
Commentators associated with the Murdoch media group News Corp Australia are also copied on this email, as News Corp Australia is a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, with which ATAGI chair Nigel Crawford is also associated as Director of SAEFIC (Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination in the Community). The Murdoch Children's Research Institute is involved in vaccine research, including Covid-19 vaccine development with the Doherty Institute. These associations make for interesting conflicts of interest which are impacting on taxpayer-funded Covid-19 vaccination policy. People associated with the taxpayer-funded ABC are also copied on this email, it's way past time the ABC provided critical analysis on this matter - this highly controversial subject should be out in the open before the upcoming federal election.
Please see my email to ATAGI chair Nigel Crawford below.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
I started commenting when I started reading. Probably a good idea. I'm now rather upset. I don't normally post links to my own stuff, but in the context of this I want to share a letter I emailed to a NZ MP, Megan Woods, who I know.
CovAIDS 4th Anniversary: NZ: Open letter to Megan Woods M.P. from an Old Colleague
It will be of use. I've only started on Megan and I know other MPs, both Labour and National, so the more data the better. I intend to just chip away when I can, while I can. So thanks for this.
Ursula, strongly suggest you get in contact with Sasha Latypova. She has some important information about the chain-of-custody for the jabs in the US and the redactions of the batch numbers seems important.
I registered vaxxathon.co.nz a few days before Super Saturday. Had it pointing to a post of mine recommending that nobody get vaccinated. On Friday afternoon before the Saturday in question I received an email from the organizers asking if I was willing to sell. Didn’t see it until Sunday unfortunately but still told them to fuck off.
The Covid-19 injections should never have been foisted upon the population.
Countless people who were never at serious risk of disease, including children and young people…most people actually…were coerced, intimidated, and many were even MANDATED to submit to these medical interventions.
In Australia, the entire population has been deliberately terrorised about Covid-19, with widespread mandates imposed, trashing voluntary informed consent.
What has happened in Australia is beyond belief – coerced medical interventions in a supposed ‘free’ country.
This is a scandal of ginormous proportions, still hidden from public view, as the rotten conflicted mainstream media here has failed to inform the public.
What must be investigated now are the actions of the National Cabinet, led by then Prime Minister Scott Morrison, along with former premiers Daniel Andrews, Mark McGowan and others, and the Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly and the AHPPC. This is where the vaccine mandates were initiated, with the floodgates eventually opening for mandates around the country.
For more background, see for example my substack articles:
- Coercion, intimidation and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent for vaccination. There has been no valid consent for COVID-19 vaccination: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/coercion-intimidation-and-mandates
- The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. “A political decision, not a health decision”: https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed
I am very proud to have been involved in the Kids’ case to try and halt the rollout to children in NZ, though I’m so sad that we failed. There are a handful of dead children who should be alive today. Bloomfield et al knew this would happen.
What do you call it when a government knows that an intervention will kill some children, but ploughs ahead with it anyway?
If only those clowns in the video had some understanding of the devastation they helped to cause.
I have so much gratitude and respect for all of you who pushed back against this madness.
From “No need for sanctions for the unvaccinated” to a two-tier society in less than 18 months:
https://rumble.com/v1ozs5r-jacinda-ardern-goes-from-no-need-to-sanction-the-unvaccinated-to-a-two-tier.html
NEVER Forget!
NEVER EVER FORGIVE!!
Gold. Thank you.
"I dare you to grit your teeth and watch to the end of this clip" - couldn't do it. Sorry.
Nor could I.
It was all new to me so I was entranced by it.
Especially the business class shooters.
Re Covid-19 vaccination of children...who were at little or no risk of disease...
I challenged Nigel Crawford, the Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) about this in my email to him dated 22 April 2022, see text below...I didn't receive a response...
Nigel Crawford, why does ATAGI recommend the use of the paediatric Pfizer COVID-19 injection in all children aged 5 to 11 years in Australia?[1]
ATAGI advice notes "Most children with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic or experience a mild illness. Those who are symptomatic typically have a short illness with a median duration of 5 days..." ATAGI also notes that "...children aged 5-11 years...were the least likely of all age groups to require hospitalisation or ICU admission for COVID-19..." ATAGI also notes: "Deaths in children due to COVID-19 are rare. Data from the United Kingdom suggest that 2 per every 1 million children infected with the virus died of COVID-19."
ATAGI advice indicates most children have an effective natural immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and are at low risk of disease, i.e. COVID-19.
Q.1. What is the independent and objective scientific evidence underpinning ATAGI's recommendation that children aged 5 to 11 years have two injections of the TGA provisionally approved Pfizer COVID-19 COMIRNATY mRNA pharmaceutical product?[2]
Q.2. Does the paediatric Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injection for children aged 5 to 11 years prevent infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2?
Q.3. What are the long term risks of initiating COVID-19 novel mRNA injections in children, such as the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injection?
Q.4 What impact will this medical intervention have on children's natural immune response to SARS-CoV-2 going forward?
Q.5 Is it planned to give children regular COVID-19 injections in future, as appears to be being set up across the broader population, with the securing of 280 million doses of COVID-19 injections to support the COVID-19 injection roll-out[3] for Australia's population of 26 million, i.e. more than 10 doses for everyone in Australia?
Q.6 What is the scientific rationale for giving COVID-19 mRNA injections to individuals at low risk from COVID-19?
Q.7 Where is the independent and objective scientific evidence demonstrating the safety of novel mRNA injections for children?
Health care practitioners are administering the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA injections to children:
Q.8. Have any health care practitioners questioned why ATAGI recommends these COVID-19 mRNA injections for children given children's low risk of COVID-19?
Young children are relying on their parents/carers to provide 'valid voluntary consent' to the COVID-19 mRNA injections on their behalf. Parents must be properly informed of the risks of 'the virus'/disease relevant to age and health status:
Q.9. Are health care practitioners being reminded of their ethical responsibility to obtain 'valid voluntary consent' before administration of the COVID-19 mRNA injections, as stipulated in the section on 'Valid consent' in The Australian Immunisation Handbook?[4] For example, valid consent "must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation" and "It can only be given after the potential risks of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person".
Nigel Crawford, I request your early response to my questions.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
Original email accessible via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/04/why-does-atagi-recommend-covid-19-mrna-injections-for-all-children-aged-5-to-11-years.pdf
I forwarded my email to ATAGI Chair Nigel Crawford, above, to Karen Price, then President of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) on 9 May 2022, see text below. No response from Karen Price either...these people treat the concerns of the public with contempt...
Karen Price, please see below my email to Nigel Crawford, Chair of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), questioning ATAGI's recommendation for COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years.
As children are at low risk of COVID-19, why are parents/carers being pressed to have children injected with these novel mRNA pharmaceutical products?
Has the RACGP questioned ATAGI why children are being injected with these novel mRNA pharmaceutical products?
Is 'valid voluntary consent' being properly obtained before the administration of these medical interventions to children? What information is being provided to parents/carers to enable them to make an informed decision on this medical intervention?
Karen Price, I've previously asked you to clarify how general practitioners are obtaining valid voluntary consent from people before administration of the Covid-19 jabs, see my email: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding 'valid voluntary consent', 28 February 2022. More than two months later you have still not responded - I question whether this is gross negligence, your refusal to engage on this most important matter.
The RACGP says: "Patient-centred care is at the heart of every Australian general practice, and at the heart of everything we do".
Karen Price, general practitioners have an ethical responsibility to care for their patients, including obtaining 'valid voluntary consent' before any medical intervention, including vaccination, as stipulated in The Australian Immunisation Handbook. You are president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, please respond to my emails regarding 'valid voluntary consent'.
Commentators associated with the Murdoch media group News Corp Australia are also copied on this email, as News Corp Australia is a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, with which ATAGI chair Nigel Crawford is also associated as Director of SAEFIC (Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination in the Community). The Murdoch Children's Research Institute is involved in vaccine research, including Covid-19 vaccine development with the Doherty Institute. These associations make for interesting conflicts of interest which are impacting on taxpayer-funded Covid-19 vaccination policy. People associated with the taxpayer-funded ABC are also copied on this email, it's way past time the ABC provided critical analysis on this matter - this highly controversial subject should be out in the open before the upcoming federal election.
Please see my email to ATAGI chair Nigel Crawford below.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent researcher investigating the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
vaccinationispolitical.net
Original email to Karen Price, including email to Nigel Crawford, accessible via this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/05/why-does-atagi-recommend-covid-19-mrna-injections-for-all-children-aged-5-to-11-years_-email-to-karen-price-president-of-the-racgp.pdf
I started commenting when I started reading. Probably a good idea. I'm now rather upset. I don't normally post links to my own stuff, but in the context of this I want to share a letter I emailed to a NZ MP, Megan Woods, who I know.
CovAIDS 4th Anniversary: NZ: Open letter to Megan Woods M.P. from an Old Colleague
https://craighutchinson.substack.com/p/nz-open-letter-to-megan-woods-mpfrom
These people all need to be held to account.
https://open.substack.com/pub/tooblindtoseetooscaredtoask/p/new-zealand-minister-of-covid-19?r=q9aq0&utm_medium=ios this may be of use?
It will be of use. I've only started on Megan and I know other MPs, both Labour and National, so the more data the better. I intend to just chip away when I can, while I can. So thanks for this.
the 1%ers won't be one bit interested in keeping meg@n cherry tree
I think that's right. You might say I'm starting with the lowest hanging fruit.
Ursula, strongly suggest you get in contact with Sasha Latypova. She has some important information about the chain-of-custody for the jabs in the US and the redactions of the batch numbers seems important.
You’ve posted this on the anniversary of the first lockdown. Also my birthday.
Happy Birthday, my friend. And what a lucky escape you had?
Thanks.
You mean Moscow? Will likely be back there soon. But might see how it plays out a little first.
Happy birthday 🌹
Thanks.
thanks Ursula - this is a most chilling and sinister read. Kiwi lambs to the proverbial.....
I registered vaxxathon.co.nz a few days before Super Saturday. Had it pointing to a post of mine recommending that nobody get vaccinated. On Friday afternoon before the Saturday in question I received an email from the organizers asking if I was willing to sell. Didn’t see it until Sunday unfortunately but still told them to fuck off.
Here it is.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220122014004/vaxxathon.co.nz/
Ah I also registered supersaturday co nz - maybe that’s the one that they emailed me about.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220121200915/http://supersaturday.co.nz/
That’s was a spine chilling read and watch, your research is excellent Ursula, thank you for what you report, I share with many.
here's a link to very important new interview between John Campbell and lawyer Julian Gillespie
https://youtu.be/nbh_NB6LNaI