Yes it was from the U.K. Mindspace report - 2011. Remember Jacinda was a protégé of Blair, and Blair’s $mills has paid for global pro-jab propaganda for years. The privacy act basically secured anyone paid by Gov, that’s why it was invented.
I agree 100%. We are entitled to know who made these judgements, what their personal expertise was in understanding the science behind the jabs that they were imposing on their fellow humankind, and if they were themselves exempt and if so, on what grounds were they exempt? If those involved are confident that they were doing the right thing, they ought to have no problem identifying themselves. We do not expect to operate under a cloak of secrecy on such matters in a democratic country.
Approximately 30% of nurses in my hospital received religious exemptions...I figured it was because we were so short staffed (compared to other places firing everyone). Personally, I believed the shot would kill me because I never saw a pandemic, (I still try and warn people but few can hear).
Who exactly decided the Medical Exemptions from Jabbing in New Zealand ?
They should be named.
The authorities will cite the “Privacy Act’ to redact names, “to protect the security of those living persons”. But Karma won’t protect them!
"Apart from we are no longer in a democratic country, probably never were".
Sadly, I have come to the same point in my own thinking. It feels quite surreal.
If the individuals concerned were on government appointed and paid for panels, I do not believe they ought to be able to hide behind the privacy act. I don't know the law on this though. Have you read this aspect of our government's mendacity? https://nzcovidresponse.substack.com/p/reliance-on-slick-advertising?publication_id=1504625&post_id=136262467&isFreemail=true&r=rmuwa&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Any faith most had in our government's (and opposition parties) honesty and basic human decency must surely be in tatters by now.
Yes it was from the U.K. Mindspace report - 2011. Remember Jacinda was a protégé of Blair, and Blair’s $mills has paid for global pro-jab propaganda for years. The privacy act basically secured anyone paid by Gov, that’s why it was invented.
I agree 100%. We are entitled to know who made these judgements, what their personal expertise was in understanding the science behind the jabs that they were imposing on their fellow humankind, and if they were themselves exempt and if so, on what grounds were they exempt? If those involved are confident that they were doing the right thing, they ought to have no problem identifying themselves. We do not expect to operate under a cloak of secrecy on such matters in a democratic country.
Apart from we are no longer in a democratic country, probably never were.
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/blair-gates-and-google-how-education-was-captured for the connection between propaganda & Blair & Jacinda & Jabs.
Democide architects. No other phrase describes what was happening here.
I eagerly await your articles. Thank you for your bravery.
Too many lawyers in government. Is that what they do all day, thinking of ways to f#ck with people?
Approximately 30% of nurses in my hospital received religious exemptions...I figured it was because we were so short staffed (compared to other places firing everyone). Personally, I believed the shot would kill me because I never saw a pandemic, (I still try and warn people but few can hear).
Can you PM me please Dee?